At KAUPIA-DARMSTAEDTER BEITRAEGE ZUR NATURGESCHICHTE, we are committed to maintaining the highest standards of scholarly excellence through a rigorous peer review process. Below is an overview of how our peer review works.

1. Overview of the Process

The peer review process involves the evaluation of submitted manuscripts by experts in the field. This ensures that the research is original, valid, and contributes to the existing body of knowledge.

2. Submission

  • Upon submission, the editorial team conducts an initial assessment to check for compliance with our guidelines and the relevance of the manuscript to our journal’s scope.

3. Reviewer Selection

  • If the manuscript passes the initial assessment, it is sent to at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the field.
  • Reviewers are selected based on their expertise and experience relevant to the manuscript topic.

4. Review Criteria

Reviewers will assess the manuscript based on the following criteria:

  • Originality and significance of the research.
  • Clarity and organization of the writing.
  • Methodological rigor and appropriateness.
  • Quality and relevance of the references.
  • Contribution to the field of natural history.

5. Review Timeline

  • The review process typically takes 2 weeks, but it may vary based on reviewer availability.
  • Authors are encouraged to suggest potential reviewers during submission, though the final decision lies with the editorial team.

6. Reviewer Feedback

  • Reviewers provide detailed feedback, which may include suggestions for revisions or a recommendation for acceptance or rejection.
  • Authors will receive feedback and a decision from the editorial office, which will include the comments from the reviewers.

7. Revision and Resubmission

  • If revisions are requested, authors will have the opportunity to address the reviewers’ comments and submit a revised manuscript.
  • The revised manuscript may undergo further review, depending on the extent of the changes.

8. Final Decision

  • After the review process is complete, the editorial team makes the final decision regarding publication.
  • Authors will be notified of the outcome and any further steps necessary for publication.

9. Ethical Considerations

  • All reviewers are required to adhere to ethical guidelines and confidentiality throughout the review process.
  • Conflicts of interest must be disclosed by both reviewers and authors.

10. Contact Us

If you have any questions regarding the peer review process, please reach out to us at:
Email: kaupia.darmstaedter@gmail.com